Buyers now ask AI about brands before they buy. Know what every model says about yours, catch wrong or outdated claims fast, and prove the fixes stuck.
For comms teams answering to legal and leadership, every claim comes with the model, the date, and the full answer attached.
Reputation Analysis
An old controversy can sink one dimension of how AI describes you while product quality scores fine. Reputation breaks into scored dimensions set against your competitors, so comms works the specific weakness instead of a vague average, and sees where a rival is exposed too.
Evidence Archive
A customer's screenshot of a bad AI answer proves little. The archived response, with the model, the date, and your brand highlighted inside the claim, is a record comms and legal can act on when they correct the sources behind it.
Annotations
You fixed the page, briefed the cited sources, and shipped the statement in March. A dated marker on the sentiment chart ties that work to the recovery that followed, which is the one slide a skeptical stakeholder accepts.
Sentiment, claims, and evidence for every AI answer that mentions your brand.
Each brand mention gets a sentiment score, so you can trend how positively AI talks about you over time.
One model can repeat an old story the others dropped. Per-model sentiment shows exactly which assistant hurts you.
Reputation analysis flags negative, wrong, or stale statements AI makes about your brand, with the answer as evidence.
Every answer is archived in full, so comms and legal can see the exact wording, model, and date of any claim.
After you publish corrections, weekly runs show whether each model picked them up or kept repeating the old line.
Weekly sentiment trends surface a turn in tone before it spreads across models and into buyer conversations.
Four steps from first sentiment read to verified corrections.
Your prompts run weekly across the models, and every mention of your brand gets a sentiment score.
Reputation analysis surfaces the negative, wrong, or outdated statements worth your attention, with the full answer attached.
Fix your own pages and work the third-party sources the models cite when they repeat the claim.
Watch each model's answers and sentiment respond, and keep the archive as proof for stakeholders.
Reputation jobs, from quiet quarters to active incidents.
Keep a standing sentiment report ready for the question leadership will eventually ask.
During an incident, track which models repeat the story and which have already moved on.
Export archived answers as evidence when a model repeats a false claim about your products.
Chart sentiment after a fix and attach the annotation that marks when you shipped it.
"After noticing rising visits from various LLMs in GA4, we needed visibility into those black boxes. LLM Pulse gave us the clarity to understand our brand's evolution and shape new strategies to boost our exposure."
Common questions about managing your brand's reputation in AI answers.
How mentions are scored and rolled into per-model sentiment trends.
Read moreFinding the wrong, outdated, and negative claims AI makes about brands.
Read moreA quick outside-in look at how AI models currently present your brand.
Read moreGet your first sentiment read across five AI models this week, with a 14-day free trial.
Trusted by 5,000+ users worldwide