Peec AI has established itself as a credible platform for monitoring brand visibility across AI search engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. The Berlin-based startup raised €7 million in funding and offers clean dashboards. However, several factors prompt marketing teams to evaluate alternatives: the €89/month entry price covers only 25 prompts with just three AI platforms included, additional engines require paid add-ons, and the platform focuses primarily on monitoring rather than actionable optimization recommendations.
This analysis examines the leading Peec.AI alternatives, comparing pricing, features, and value propositions to help teams select the optimal AI visibility tracking solution.
Why teams search for Peec AI alternatives
While Peec AI delivers solid monitoring capabilities, several considerations drive teams to explore alternatives:
- Cost per prompt: At €89/month for 25 prompts, Peec AI charges €3.56 per prompt on the Starter plan, significantly higher than competitors offering €0.99-€1.23 per prompt
- Add-on costs: Core engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews) are included, but tracking Gemini, Claude, DeepSeek, or Grok requires additional paid add-ons that increase monthly costs substantially
- Limited actionability: The platform excels at showing where you rank but provides minimal guidance on improving visibility through content optimization or technical recommendations
- Monitoring focus: Unlike competitors that offer site audits, content gap analysis, or optimization workflows, Peec AI concentrates exclusively on visibility tracking
- Prompt scaling costs: Growing from 25 to 100 prompts requires upgrading from €89 to €199/month, a 124% price increase for 4× the volume
Evaluation criteria for Peec AI alternatives
When comparing platforms, consider these key factors:
- Base price and included features: What coverage comes standard without add-ons?
- Cost per tracked prompt: The true economic measure for scaling monitoring programs
- Platform coverage: Number of AI engines monitored (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, etc.)
- Tracking frequency: Daily, weekly, or on-demand monitoring cadence
- Actionability: Beyond metrics, does the platform provide optimization recommendations?
- Team collaboration: User seats, shared dashboards, and access controls
Best Peec AI alternatives: detailed comparison
1. LLM Pulse: best value for European teams
Pricing: €49/month (Starter, 40 prompts) | €99/month (Growth, 100 prompts)
Cost per prompt: €1.23 (Starter) | €0.99 (Growth)
Coverage: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews (all included, no add-ons)
Why it’s the top alternative:
- Superior pricing: 65% lower cost per prompt than Peec AI Starter (€1.23 vs €3.56) and 50% lower than Peec AI Pro (€0.99 vs €1.99)
- No hidden costs: All four major AI platforms included in base price; no add-on fees for additional engines
- Better entry value: 40 prompts at €49 versus 25 prompts at €89 provides 60% more tracking capacity for 45% less cost
- Optimal growth tier: At €99/month for 100 prompts, LLM Pulse Growth costs 50% less than Peec AI Pro while offering identical prompt volume
- Bootstrapped pricing model: No venture capital pressure allows sustainable pricing focused on customer value rather than investor returns
- Full answer preservation: Complete AI responses saved, not just visibility scores
- Competitor benchmarking: Share of voice analysis and competitive positioning included at all tiers
- Brand sentiment tracking: Explainable sentiment analysis across models
Best for: European marketing teams, agencies, and SaaS companies seeking comprehensive multi-engine coverage at the most competitive per-prompt pricing without add-on fees.
Limitations: Newer platform compared to Peec AI (though rapidly shipping features); primary focus on European market (though serves global customers).
2. Otterly AI: daily tracking specialist
Pricing: $29/month (Lite, 10-15 prompts) | $189/month (Standard, 100 prompts) | $989/month (Pro, 1,000 prompts)
Cost per prompt: $1.93-$2.90 (Lite) | $1.89 (Standard)
Coverage: Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity
Strengths:
- Daily tracking cadence as standard (versus weekly on many competitors)
- Strong focus on AI search platforms with link citation tracking
- Brand Visibility Index proprietary metric
- Clean, user-friendly interface praised in reviews
- 14-day free trial available
Considerations:
- Add-on prompt packs cost $99 per 100 prompts, increasing total cost at scale
- US dollar pricing may be less favorable for European buyers given exchange rates
- Limited platform coverage compared to alternatives offering Claude, Gemini, etc.
Best for: Teams requiring daily monitoring cadence and willing to pay premium pricing for faster update frequency.
3. Promptmonitor: budget-focused option
Pricing: $29/month (Starter) | $89/month (Growth)
Cost per prompt: Variable (unlimited LLM tracking)
Coverage: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Grok, Google AI Overview, Google AI Mode (8+ platforms)
Strengths:
- Most affordable entry point at $29/month
- Broadest platform coverage (8+ AI engines included)
- Unique contact discovery feature extracting emails and social profiles from cited sources for outreach
- AI crawler analytics showing bot activity on your site
- GDPR-compliant privacy-first website analytics
Considerations:
- Smaller team and newer platform compared to funded competitors
- Less enterprise-focused features (though sufficient for most SMB needs)
- Contact discovery focus may not align with all use cases
Best for: Bootstrapped startups and small marketing teams prioritizing platform breadth and budget over enterprise features.
4. Rankshift: flexible credit-based model
Pricing: €49/month (10,000 credits) to €639/month (100,000 credits)
Cost per prompt: Variable based on LLM choice and tracking frequency
Coverage: ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity
Strengths:
- Credit-based system allows flexible allocation across prompts and models
- Unlimited users and unlimited projects on all plans (no per-seat fees)
- Global coverage with no geographic restrictions
- Credit simulator helps estimate needs before purchasing
- Can customize tracking frequency per prompt (daily, weekly, monthly)
Considerations:
- Credit system adds complexity compared to straightforward prompt-based pricing
- Requires calculation to determine effective per-prompt cost
- May be overkill for teams wanting simple, predictable pricing
Best for: Agencies managing multiple clients with varying tracking needs; teams wanting granular control over resource allocation.
5. First Answer AI: multi-model coverage
Pricing: $39/month (Start, 10 prompts) | $189/month (Growth, ~100 prompts)
Cost per prompt: $3.90 (Start) | $1.89 (Growth)
Coverage: ChatGPT, Google AI, Gemini, Bing Copilot, Grok, Perplexity (6 platforms)
Strengths:
- Broad platform coverage including Bing Copilot and Grok
- Specializes in GEO, AIO, and AEO optimization
- Actionable insights and recommendations included
- Distributed prompt network for comprehensive monitoring
Considerations:
- Start plan very limited at only 10 prompts for $39
- Growth plan pricing comparable to Otterly without daily tracking advantage
- Less public user feedback compared to established competitors
Best for: Teams needing Bing Copilot and Grok coverage specifically; North American market focus.
Comprehensive pricing comparison
| Platform | Entry price | Prompts | Cost per prompt | Platforms included | Key differentiator |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLM Pulse | €49 | 40 | €1.23 | 4 (no add-ons needed) | Best value, no hidden costs |
| Peec AI | €89 | 25 | €3.56 | 3 (add-ons extra) | 115+ languages, funded startup |
| Otterly AI | $29 | 10-15 | $1.93-$2.90 | 3 | Daily tracking standard |
| Promptmonitor | $29 | Variable | Variable | 8+ | Contact discovery, most platforms |
| Rankshift | €49 | Variable | Variable | 4 | Credit flexibility, unlimited projects |
| First Answer | $39 | 10 | $3.90 | 6 | Broad platform coverage |
Mid-tier comparison (100 prompts)
| Platform | 100-prompt price | Cost per prompt | Savings vs Peec AI Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| LLM Pulse Growth | €99 | €0.99 | €100/month (50% savings) |
| Peec AI Pro | €199 | €1.99 | Baseline |
| Otterly Standard | $189 | $1.89 | ~€10/month (5% savings) |
| First Answer Growth | $189 | $1.89 | ~€10/month (5% savings) |
Decision framework: which alternative is right for you?
Choose LLM Pulse if you want:
- The lowest cost per prompt among European platforms (€0.99-€1.23)
- All major AI platforms included without add-on fees
- 60% more tracking capacity (40 vs 25 prompts) at 45% lower cost than Peec AI Starter
- 50% cost savings at the 100-prompt tier versus Peec.AI Pro
- Bootstrapped company focused on sustainable pricing rather than investor-driven growth
- Full answer preservation, competitor benchmarking, and sentiment analysis included
Choose Otterly AI if you need:
- Daily tracking cadence as non-negotiable requirement
- Brand Visibility Index metric specifically
- Willing to pay $1.89 per prompt for daily updates
- Citation tracking is primary focus over broader optimization
Choose Promptmonitor if you prioritize:
- Absolute lowest entry price ($29/month)
- Broadest platform coverage (8+ AI engines)
- Contact discovery for outreach campaigns
- Budget over enterprise features or brand recognition
Choose Rankshift if you require:
- Unlimited projects and users (agency use case)
- Flexible credit allocation across varying tracking needs
- Granular control over tracking frequency per prompt
- Comfortable managing credit-based system complexity
Stay with Peec AI if you specifically need:
- Established vendor relationship and priority support
- Budget is not primary constraint and you value their specific UX
- Recently funded startup trajectory matters for your evaluation
Common questions about switching from Peec AI
Will I lose historical data if I switch platforms?
Most platforms, including LLM Pulse, allow CSV export of historical data. Most importantly – we offer a free data importer to migrate your Peec AI hassle free into LLM Pulse – start today.
How does tracking accuracy compare across platforms?
All reputable platforms use similar methodologies: running structured prompts against AI engines and logging responses. Accuracy differences are minimal, though tracking frequency (daily vs weekly) affects how quickly you detect changes.
Can I run both platforms simultaneously during transition?
Yes, and this is recommended. Run parallel tracking for 2-4 weeks to validate consistency before fully switching. Most platforms offer monthly billing with no long-term commitment. Most importantly – we offer a free data importer to migrate your Peec AI hassle free into LLM Pulse – start today.
What about customer support quality?
Peec AI offers email and Slack support on Pro+ tiers. LLM Pulse provides in-platform support across all plans with response times under 24 hours. Otterly and Promptmonitor offer similar support models. For enterprise support needs, evaluate responsiveness during trial periods.
Migration checklist: switching from Peec AI
- Export your data: Download prompt lists, historical visibility data, and competitor configurations from Peec AI
- Start free trial: Most alternatives offer 7-14 day free trials; test with your actual prompts
- Configure tracking: Set up identical prompts in new platform to enable comparison
- Run parallel: Track simultaneously for 2-4 weeks to validate data consistency
- Evaluate results: Compare insights, usability, and value delivered
- Make decision: Switch fully or negotiate better terms with Peec AI based on competitive quotes
- Cancel timing: Peec AI offers month-to-month contracts; cancel before next billing cycle
Most importantly – we offer a free data importer to migrate your Peec AI hassle free into LLM Pulse – start today.
Conclusion: best overall Peec.AI alternative
For European marketing teams and agencies seeking comprehensive AI visibility tracking without excessive costs, LLM Pulse represents the strongest Peec AI alternative. The platform delivers 65% lower cost per prompt, includes all major AI engines without add-on fees, and provides 60% more tracking capacity at the entry tier while costing 45% less.
At the growth tier, LLM Pulse offers 50% cost savings (€99 vs €199) for identical prompt volume, making it particularly compelling for teams scaling their monitoring programs. The bootstrapped business model ensures pricing remains sustainable and customer-focused rather than driven by investor return expectations.
While Peec AI excels in some things and offers a polished interface, most teams find that LLM Pulse’s comprehensive feature set, superior economics, and transparent pricing deliver better overall value. For teams requiring daily tracking specifically, Otterly AI offers competitive capabilities, though at higher absolute costs. Budget-conscious startups should evaluate Promptmonitor’s $29 entry point and broad platform coverage.
Start your free evaluation: Compare LLM Pulse pricing and features to see how much you can save while gaining comprehensive AI visibility tracking across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, and AI Overviews.
