We asked ChatGPT to write an objective comparison of LLM Pulse (that’s us) and Peec.ai. Below is the output we received, reviewed for factual accuracy and updated where public claims are ambiguous.
Choosing the right AI visibility tracking platform can be challenging, especially as tools differ in scope, methodology, and pricing. In this post, we compare LLM Pulse and Peec.ai side by side, highlighting their business models, coverage, cadence, pricing efficiency, and integrations. The goal is not to declare a “winner,” but to provide a clear, factual overview that helps teams understand which platform better suits their needs.
TL;DR
- Business model: LLM Pulse is bootstrapped. Peec.ai is VC-funded (public materials cite ~€7M raised) with a team listed at 11–50 people.
- Coverage: LLM Pulse includes Google AI Mode in plans (plus ChatGPT, Perplexity, and AI Overviews). Peec.ai’s base plans cover ChatGPT, Perplexity, and AI Overviews; AI Mode, Gemini, Claude, DeepSeek, etc. are add-ons.
- Cadence: Peec.ai markets daily runs. LLM Pulse runs weekly by default (daily available on demand). For brand visibility, daily rarely adds signal over weekly for most use cases.
- Pricing efficiency: For like-for-like prompt counts, LLM Pulse generally costs less per tracked prompt (e.g., 100 prompts: €99 vs. €199).
- Brand Sentiment: LLM Pulse’s Brand Sentiment is live and designed for explainability and consistency across prompts/models.
- Reporting & charts: Peec.ai leans into polished dashboards and agency pitch workspaces; LLM Pulse emphasizes auditable, citation-level detail and competitor side-by-side views. (Peec’s docs/UI don’t clearly expose a single “Share of Voice” KPI across all views, though they do surface a “share of chats/visibility” concept.)
- Integrations: Peec.ai offers a Looker Studio connector. LLM Pulse Looker Studio is on our roadmap and coming soon.
What each platform covers
LLM Pulse
- Engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode (included).
- Focus: Prompt tracking, visibility scoring, citations analysis, competitor benchmarking, tagging, prompt suggestions, and Brand Sentiment (live).
- Cadence: Weekly by default with clearly defined responses/week per model caps; daily available on demand.
- Pricing highlights: Lower entry price and more prompts per € at comparable tiers.
Peec AI
- Base coverage: ChatGPT, Perplexity, and AI Overviews on Starter/Pro/Enterprise.
- Add-ons: Gemini, AI Mode, Claude, DeepSeek, Llama, Grok (available for an additional fee on Enterprise).
- Cadence: Markets daily interval runs across models.
- UI & use cases: Polished charts and agency pitch workspaces; strong positioning for agencies managing multiple brands.
Daily vs. weekly: does frequency move the needle?
For AI visibility tracking, day-to-day swings are typically modest. Weekly cadence provides a clearer signal for strategy (content, PR, and partnerships) without the noise and overhead of reviewing mostly unchanged daily snapshots. Daily checks can be useful during campaigns or incidents; for ongoing programs, weekly is usually the right granularity.
Pricing & prompt limits (public pages)
LLM Pulse
| Plan | Monthly price | Tracked prompts | Seats | Cadence / notes | Key coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLM Pulse – Starter | 49€ | 40 | 1 | Weekly; 40 responses/week per model | ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Mode, AI Overviews |
| LLM Pulse – Growth | 99€ | 100 | 2 | Weekly; 100 responses/week per model | Same as above |
| LLM Pulse – Scale | 299€ | 300 | 5 | Weekly; 300 responses/week per model | Same as above |
Peec.ai
| Plan | Monthly price | Tracked prompts | Seats | Cadence / notes | Key coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peec – Starter | €89 | 25 | Unlimited | Daily interval; 3 countries | ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews |
| Peec – Pro | €199 | 100 | Unlimited | Daily interval; 5 countries | ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews |
| Peec – Enterprise | €499+ | 300+ | Unlimited | Daily interval; 10+ countries | ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews; AI Mode, Gemini, Claude, DeepSeek etc. as paid add-ons |
Illustrative per-prompt comparison at ~100 prompts: LLM Pulse Growth €99 → ~€0.99 / prompt; Peec Pro €199 → ~€1.99 / prompt.
Feature parity & key differences
- Broad parity: Both platforms track prompts over time, surface brand mentions/citations, benchmark competitors, and provide dashboards for trends and comparisons.
- AI Mode availability: LLM Pulse includes AI Mode tracking in standard plans. Peec.ai lists AI Mode as an add-on (Enterprise page note).
- Brand Sentiment: LLM Pulse’s sentiment module is live and built for consistent, explainable scoring across prompts and LLMs. (Our homepage will be updated.)
- Charts & shareability: Peec.ai emphasizes sleek charts and pitch workspaces for agencies. LLM Pulse centers on auditable details (full responses, citations, competitor side-by-side) for diagnosis and action.
- “Share of Voice” wording: Peec’s site leans on “Visibility/share of chats” rather than a single, platform-wide “Share of Voice” KPI. LLM Pulse reports visibility and competitive comparisons; SoV-style reporting can be derived from tracked prompts.
- Integrations: Peec.ai offers a Looker Studio connector today. LLM Pulse Looker Studio integration is coming soon.
Company stage & resources
- LLM Pulse: Bootstrapped and focused on accuracy-first measurement (no synthetic “search volume” modeling for chat prompts).
- Peec AI: VC-backed and growing quickly (public materials cite ~€7M raised; LinkedIn shows 11–50 employees). More capital and headcount may translate into faster UI polish and agency-grade reporting extras.
Who should choose what?
Pick LLM Pulse if…
- You need AI Mode included alongside ChatGPT, Perplexity, and AI Overviews.
- You value explainable sentiment and auditable visibility with citations and competitor side-by-side detail.
- You want more prompts per € at common tiers with predictable per-model caps.
Pick Peec.ai if…
- You want daily-interval runs out of the box and agency-oriented pitch workspaces.
- You prefer to add models like Gemini, Claude, DeepSeek as needed (on Enterprise) and you plan to build dashboards in Looker Studio right away.
Methodology & timestamp
We compiled this using publicly available vendor pages and docs plus our own product details. Public pages were reviewed on September 14, 2025. Where we relied on internal product updates (e.g., LLM Pulse Brand Sentiment is live), we’ve noted it explicitly.
