Historical Tracking

Historical tracking is the longitudinal measurement of brand mentions, citations, and sentiment in AI-generated answers. By storing full responses over time, teams can analyze trends, attribute improvements to content changes, and forecast volatility across platforms.

Why historical tracking matters

  • Attribution: Connect visibility lifts to specific releases or PR moments.
  • Seasonality: Separate cyclical patterns from lasting improvements.
  • Forecasting: Anticipate platform behavior and plan content updates.

What to store

  • Full responses with timestamps, platform, prompt, and citations.
  • Mention, sentiment, and positioning annotations.
  • Tags for topics, products, regions, and campaigns.

LLM Pulse provides auditable response history and time‑series views across platforms and tags to support robust analysis.

How to implement a durable archive

  • Define a stable prompt corpus: Include discovery (best‑for), education (what is), and comparison (X vs Y) prompts for each category you care about.
  • Normalize metadata: Always capture platform, timestamp, prompt, project/brand, locale, and competitor set so data remains comparable.
  • Store raw and derived data: Keep the full answer text and citations plus derived fields such as mention flags, sentiment scores, citation position, and positioning phrases.
  • Version content: Note when your own pages changed to correlate cause and effect with visibility shifts.

Analysis playbook (from snapshot to story)

  1. Establish baselines (week 0–2): Measure mention frequency, citation frequency, share‑of‑voice, and sentiment per platform.
  2. Annotate moments: Product launches, pricing changes, PR hits, and major content releases.
  3. Compare deltas by platform: Expect Perplexity/Google AI to react faster (retrieval), and ChatGPT / Claude to shift slower (training‑led).
  4. Identify durable wins: Pages that sustain earlier citation positions or improved positioning phrases for 4+ weeks.
  5. Feed the roadmap: Convert findings into content updates (refreshes, new comparisons, added FAQs) and seeding placements.

KPIs and heuristics

  • Stability: 4‑week moving average of mentions by platform and tag.
  • Momentum: Week‑over‑week change in citation‑weighted visibility.
  • Sentiment drift: Net positive/negative shift over rolling periods.
  • Resilience: How quickly visibility recovers after platform volatility.

LLM Pulse workflow

  • Time‑series dashboards: Trend mentions, citations, and sentiment by platform and tag.
  • Answer archive: Click into any datapoint to read the exact response and citations.
  • Annotations: Tag events (launches, updates, PR) to explain trend lines.
  • Exports: Share monthly roll‑ups with execs and partner teams.

Common pitfalls

  • Changing prompts too often (breaks comparability)
  • Focusing only on one platform (misses cross‑platform shifts)
  • Ignoring position in citations (early citations carry more weight)
  • Not versioning your own content changes (hard to attribute impact)

Example insight to action

  • Observation: Perplexity citations for your “pricing” page drop after a policy update; sentiment turns cautiously negative.
  • Action: Refresh pricing page with clearer tiers, update comparisons, and add a dated change log. Re‑seed to third‑party hubs. Monitor recovery over the next 2–3 cycles.

Related concepts

Discover your brand's visibility in AI search effortlessly

Are you tracking your AI Search visbility?

START NOW WITH A
14-DAY FREE TRIAL